Congo vs Egypt: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Congo
397.34 million current US$
in 2021
Egypt
434.77 million current US$
in 2021
Congo rank
28th
Egypt rank
25th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Congo
  • Egypt
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M197019952021

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 434.77 million current US$ against 397.34 million current US$ in Congo, a difference of 37.43 million current US$.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Egypt ahead.

Congo ranks 28th and Egypt ranks 25th of 186 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Egypt Difference Ahead
1970s 31.21 million current US$ 49.46 million current US$ 18.26 million current US$ Egypt
1980s 65.55 million current US$ 147.44 million current US$ 81.89 million current US$ Egypt
1990s 129.88 million current US$ 181.92 million current US$ 52.04 million current US$ Egypt
2000s 229.01 million current US$ 236.26 million current US$ 7.25 million current US$ Egypt
2010s 417.91 million current US$ 602.24 million current US$ 184.33 million current US$ Egypt
2020s 385.86 million current US$ 450.28 million current US$ 64.42 million current US$ Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Congo or Egypt?
Egypt, at 434.77 million current US$ against 397.34 million current US$ in Congo as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Congo and Egypt?
37.43 million current US$, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Egypt?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Congo and Egypt rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Congo ranks 28th and Egypt ranks 25th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Egypt: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/congo-rep/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/congo-rep/egypt-arab-rep/">Congo vs Egypt: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.