Cape Verde vs Eritrea: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Cape Verde
- Eritrea
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 5.73 million current US$ against 5.08 million current US$ in Eritrea, a difference of 655,130 current US$.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 82nd and Eritrea ranks 84th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Eritrea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.55 million current US$ | 43.21 million current US$ | 41.66 million current US$ | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 3.50 million current US$ | 26.61 million current US$ | 23.11 million current US$ | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 6.54 million current US$ | 0 current US$ | 6.54 million current US$ | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 5.58 million current US$ | 4.87 million current US$ | 710,625 current US$ | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Cape Verde or Eritrea?
- Cape Verde, at 5.73 million current US$ against 5.08 million current US$ in Eritrea as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Cape Verde and Eritrea?
- 655,130 current US$, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Eritrea?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2021.
- How do Cape Verde and Eritrea rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Cape Verde ranks 82nd and Eritrea ranks 84th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.