Botswana vs Mauritania: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Botswana
52.12 million current US$
in 2021
Mauritania
64.32 million current US$
in 2021
Botswana rank
56th
Mauritania rank
53rd

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Botswana
  • Mauritania
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M197019952021

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 64.32 million current US$ against 52.12 million current US$ in Botswana, a difference of 12.20 million current US$.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 56th and Mauritania ranks 53rd of 186 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Mauritania Difference Ahead
1970s 7.08 million current US$ 0 current US$ 7.08 million current US$ Botswana
1980s 13.03 million current US$ 0 current US$ 13.03 million current US$ Botswana
1990s 20.50 million current US$ 0 current US$ 20.50 million current US$ Botswana
2000s 29.75 million current US$ 6.21 million current US$ 23.55 million current US$ Botswana
2010s 55.06 million current US$ 50.39 million current US$ 4.67 million current US$ Botswana
2020s 50.67 million current US$ 60.98 million current US$ 10.32 million current US$ Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Botswana or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 64.32 million current US$ against 52.12 million current US$ in Botswana as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Botswana and Mauritania?
12.20 million current US$, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mauritania?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Botswana and Mauritania rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Botswana ranks 56th and Mauritania ranks 53rd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Mauritania: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/botswana/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/botswana/mauritania/">Botswana vs Mauritania: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.