Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0 current US$
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands
30,821 current US$
in 2021
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
113th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
111th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
020.0M40.0M60.0M197019952021

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 30,821 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 30,821 current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 113th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th of 186 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 24.18 million current US$ 6,368 current US$ 24.17 million current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 29.96 million current US$ 9,578 current US$ 29.95 million current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 4.61 million current US$ 37,555 current US$ 4.58 million current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0 current US$ 34,672 current US$ 34,672 current US$ Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 30,821 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Turks and Caicos Islands?
30,821 current US$, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Turks and Caicos Islands?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 113th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.