Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Serbia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 113th and Serbia ranks 113th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.20 million current US$ | 2.65 million current US$ | 10.55 million current US$ | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 4.61 million current US$ | 6.28 million current US$ | 1.66 million current US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Serbia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia?
- 0 current US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 113th and Serbia ranks 113th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.