Belarus, Republic of vs Cyprus: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Belarus, Republic of
0 current US$
in 2021
Cyprus
0 current US$
in 2021
Belarus, Republic of rank
113th
Cyprus rank
113th
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Belarus, Republic of
- Cyprus
How they compare
Belarus, Republic of currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Cyprus, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.
Belarus, Republic of ranks 113th and Cyprus ranks 113th of 186 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus, Republic of | Cyprus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 44,225 current US$ | 44,225 current US$ | Cyprus |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | β |
| 2010s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | β |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Belarus, Republic of or Cyprus?
- Belarus, Republic of, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Cyprus as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Belarus, Republic of and Cyprus?
- 0 current US$, with Belarus, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus, Republic of and Cyprus?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
- How do Belarus, Republic of and Cyprus rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Belarus, Republic of ranks 113th and Cyprus ranks 113th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.