Barbados vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Barbados
572,854 current US$
in 2021
New Caledonia
1.24 million current US$
in 2021
Barbados rank
94th
New Caledonia rank
91st

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Barbados
  • New Caledonia
0500.0k1.0M1.5M197019952021

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 1.24 million current US$ against 572,854 current US$ in Barbados, a difference of 668,906 current US$.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 2.2 times Barbados's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 94th and New Caledonia ranks 91st of 186 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 30,737 current US$ 303,172 current US$ 272,435 current US$ New Caledonia
1980s 40,475 current US$ 445,631 current US$ 405,156 current US$ New Caledonia
1990s 182,548 current US$ 395,768 current US$ 213,221 current US$ New Caledonia
2000s 259,205 current US$ 663,947 current US$ 404,742 current US$ New Caledonia
2010s 649,785 current US$ 1.20 million current US$ 547,699 current US$ New Caledonia
2020s 613,533 current US$ 1.22 million current US$ 607,242 current US$ New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Barbados or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 1.24 million current US$ against 572,854 current US$ in Barbados as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Barbados and New Caledonia?
668,906 current US$, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and New Caledonia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Barbados and New Caledonia rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Barbados ranks 94th and New Caledonia ranks 91st of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/barbados/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/barbados/new-caledonia/">Barbados vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.