Bahamas vs Seychelles: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Bahamas
- Seychelles
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 1.75 million current US$ against 1.65 million current US$ in Bahamas, a difference of 101,010 current US$.
That makes Seychelles's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 90th and Seychelles ranks 89th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 3 and Seychelles in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.55 million current US$ | 495,556 current US$ | 2.05 million current US$ | Bahamas |
| 2000s | 699,646 current US$ | 949,608 current US$ | 249,961 current US$ | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 1.70 million current US$ | 1.66 million current US$ | 38,053 current US$ | Bahamas |
| 2020s | 1.76 million current US$ | 1.71 million current US$ | 51,625 current US$ | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Bahamas or Seychelles?
- Seychelles, at 1.75 million current US$ against 1.65 million current US$ in Bahamas as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Bahamas and Seychelles?
- 101,010 current US$, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Seychelles?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do Bahamas and Seychelles rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Bahamas ranks 90th and Seychelles ranks 89th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.