Bahamas vs Samoa: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Bahamas
1.65 million current US$
in 2021
Samoa
2.37 million current US$
in 2021
Bahamas rank
90th
Samoa rank
87th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Bahamas
  • Samoa
02.0M4.0M6.0M197019952021

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 2.37 million current US$ against 1.65 million current US$ in Bahamas, a difference of 711,360 current US$.

That makes Samoa's figure about 1.4 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 90th and Samoa ranks 87th of 186 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Samoa Difference Ahead
1970s 3.67 million current US$ 1.39 million current US$ 2.28 million current US$ Bahamas
1980s 2.02 million current US$ 2.61 million current US$ 593,036 current US$ Samoa
1990s 2.55 million current US$ 3.54 million current US$ 991,917 current US$ Samoa
2000s 699,646 current US$ 1.83 million current US$ 1.13 million current US$ Samoa
2010s 1.70 million current US$ 3.18 million current US$ 1.48 million current US$ Samoa
2020s 1.76 million current US$ 2.49 million current US$ 734,885 current US$ Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Bahamas or Samoa?
Samoa, at 2.37 million current US$ against 1.65 million current US$ in Bahamas as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Bahamas and Samoa?
711,360 current US$, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Samoa?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Bahamas and Samoa rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Bahamas ranks 90th and Samoa ranks 87th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Samoa: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/bahamas-the/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/bahamas-the/samoa/">Bahamas vs Samoa: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.