Bahamas vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Bahamas
1.65 million current US$
in 2021
New Caledonia
1.24 million current US$
in 2021
Bahamas rank
90th
New Caledonia rank
91st

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Bahamas
  • New Caledonia
02.0M4.0M6.0M197019952021

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 1.65 million current US$ against 1.24 million current US$ in New Caledonia, a difference of 411,960 current US$.

That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.3 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 90th and New Caledonia ranks 91st of 186 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 3.67 million current US$ 303,172 current US$ 3.36 million current US$ Bahamas
1980s 2.02 million current US$ 445,631 current US$ 1.57 million current US$ Bahamas
1990s 2.55 million current US$ 395,768 current US$ 2.15 million current US$ Bahamas
2000s 699,646 current US$ 663,947 current US$ 35,699 current US$ Bahamas
2010s 1.70 million current US$ 1.20 million current US$ 504,601 current US$ Bahamas
2020s 1.76 million current US$ 1.22 million current US$ 537,365 current US$ Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Bahamas or New Caledonia?
Bahamas, at 1.65 million current US$ against 1.24 million current US$ in New Caledonia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Bahamas and New Caledonia?
411,960 current US$, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and New Caledonia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Bahamas and New Caledonia rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Bahamas ranks 90th and New Caledonia ranks 91st of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/bahamas-the/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/bahamas-the/new-caledonia/">Bahamas vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.