Austria vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Austria
140.28 million current US$
in 2021
Namibia
106.20 million current US$
in 2021
Austria rank
43rd
Namibia rank
46th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Austria
  • Namibia
0100.0M200.0M300.0M197019952021

How they compare

Austria currently reports 140.28 million current US$ against 106.20 million current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 34.08 million current US$.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 43rd and Namibia ranks 46th of 186 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Namibia Difference Ahead
1970s 17.99 million current US$ 4.35 million current US$ 13.64 million current US$ Austria
1980s 44.16 million current US$ 9.12 million current US$ 35.04 million current US$ Austria
1990s 46.70 million current US$ 15.42 million current US$ 31.28 million current US$ Austria
2000s 116.31 million current US$ 34.17 million current US$ 82.15 million current US$ Austria
2010s 170.36 million current US$ 79.73 million current US$ 90.63 million current US$ Austria
2020s 120.13 million current US$ 100.38 million current US$ 19.74 million current US$ Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Austria or Namibia?
Austria, at 140.28 million current US$ against 106.20 million current US$ in Namibia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Austria and Namibia?
34.08 million current US$, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Namibia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Austria and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Austria ranks 43rd and Namibia ranks 46th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/austria/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/austria/namibia/">Austria vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.