Australia vs Uganda: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Australia
1.91 billion current US$
in 2021
Uganda
3.03 billion current US$
in 2021
Australia rank
7th
Uganda rank
5th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Australia
  • Uganda
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B197019952021

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 3.03 billion current US$ against 1.91 billion current US$ in Australia, a difference of 1.12 billion current US$.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.6 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Uganda ahead.

Australia ranks 7th and Uganda ranks 5th of 186 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 258.72 million current US$ 242.36 million current US$ 16.36 million current US$ Australia
1980s 530.88 million current US$ 496.83 million current US$ 34.05 million current US$ Australia
1990s 727.43 million current US$ 862.82 million current US$ 135.39 million current US$ Uganda
2000s 73.84 million current US$ 1.42 billion current US$ 1.34 billion current US$ Uganda
2010s 0 current US$ 3.02 billion current US$ 3.02 billion current US$ Uganda
2020s 1.93 billion current US$ 2.94 billion current US$ 1.01 billion current US$ Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Australia or Uganda?
Uganda, at 3.03 billion current US$ against 1.91 billion current US$ in Australia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Australia and Uganda?
1.12 billion current US$, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Uganda?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Australia and Uganda rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Australia ranks 7th and Uganda ranks 5th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Uganda: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/australia/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/australia/uganda/">Australia vs Uganda: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.