Aruba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Aruba
64,588 current US$
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands
30,821 current US$
in 2021
Aruba rank
110th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
111th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Aruba
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k197019952021

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 64,588 current US$ against 30,821 current US$ in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 33,767 current US$.

That makes Aruba's figure about 2.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 110th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th of 186 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 6,634 current US$ 1,042 current US$ 5,591 current US$ Aruba
1980s 8,290 current US$ 1,949 current US$ 6,341 current US$ Aruba
1990s 12,961 current US$ 6,018 current US$ 6,943 current US$ Aruba
2000s 18,165 current US$ 9,578 current US$ 8,588 current US$ Aruba
2010s 68,833 current US$ 37,555 current US$ 31,278 current US$ Aruba
2020s 71,930 current US$ 34,672 current US$ 37,257 current US$ Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Aruba or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Aruba, at 64,588 current US$ against 30,821 current US$ in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
33,767 current US$, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Aruba ranks 110th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/aruba/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/aruba/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Aruba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.