Aruba vs Liechtenstein: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Aruba
64,588 current US$
in 2021
Liechtenstein
102,891 current US$
in 2021
Aruba rank
110th
Liechtenstein rank
107th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Aruba
  • Liechtenstein
0200.0k400.0k600.0k197019952021

How they compare

Liechtenstein currently reports 102,891 current US$ against 64,588 current US$ in Aruba, a difference of 38,303 current US$.

That makes Liechtenstein's figure about 1.6 times Aruba's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Liechtenstein has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 110th and Liechtenstein ranks 107th of 186 countries.

Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Liechtenstein Difference Ahead
1990s 12,936 current US$ 169,286 current US$ 156,350 current US$ Liechtenstein
2000s 18,165 current US$ 321,013 current US$ 302,847 current US$ Liechtenstein
2010s 68,833 current US$ 274,015 current US$ 205,182 current US$ Liechtenstein
2020s 71,930 current US$ 96,428 current US$ 24,498 current US$ Liechtenstein

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Aruba or Liechtenstein?
Liechtenstein, at 102,891 current US$ against 64,588 current US$ in Aruba as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Aruba and Liechtenstein?
38,303 current US$, with Liechtenstein ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Liechtenstein?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Aruba and Liechtenstein rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Aruba ranks 110th and Liechtenstein ranks 107th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Liechtenstein: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/aruba/liechtenstein/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/aruba/liechtenstein/">Aruba vs Liechtenstein: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.