Aruba vs Iceland: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Aruba
- Iceland
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 64,588 current US$ against 27,386 current US$ in Iceland, a difference of 37,202 current US$.
That makes Aruba's figure about 2.4 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Iceland ahead.
Aruba ranks 110th and Iceland ranks 112th of 186 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 70,209 current US$ | 52,161 current US$ | 18,048 current US$ | Aruba |
| 2020s | 71,930 current US$ | 25,494 current US$ | 46,435 current US$ | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Aruba or Iceland?
- Aruba, at 64,588 current US$ against 27,386 current US$ in Iceland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Aruba and Iceland?
- 37,202 current US$, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Iceland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do Aruba and Iceland rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Aruba ranks 110th and Iceland ranks 112th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.