Aruba vs Guatemala: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Aruba
64,588 current US$
in 2021
Guatemala
0 current US$
in 2021
Aruba rank
110th
Guatemala rank
113th
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Aruba
- Guatemala
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 64,588 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Guatemala, a difference of 64,588 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 110th and Guatemala ranks 113th of 186 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 3 and Guatemala in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 6,634 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 6,634 current US$ | Aruba |
| 1980s | 8,290 current US$ | 975,221 current US$ | 966,931 current US$ | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 12,961 current US$ | 48.60 million current US$ | 48.59 million current US$ | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 18,165 current US$ | 58.19 million current US$ | 58.17 million current US$ | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 68,833 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 68,833 current US$ | Aruba |
| 2020s | 71,930 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 71,930 current US$ | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Aruba or Guatemala?
- Aruba, at 64,588 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Guatemala as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Aruba and Guatemala?
- 64,588 current US$, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Guatemala?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Aruba and Guatemala rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Aruba ranks 110th and Guatemala ranks 113th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.