Aruba vs Ecuador: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Aruba
64,588 current US$
in 2021
Ecuador
0 current US$
in 2021
Aruba rank
110th
Ecuador rank
113th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Aruba
  • Ecuador
0100.0M200.0M300.0M197019952021

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 64,588 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 64,588 current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Ecuador ahead.

Aruba ranks 110th and Ecuador ranks 113th of 186 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Ecuador Difference Ahead
1970s 6,634 current US$ 49.02 million current US$ 49.01 million current US$ Ecuador
1980s 8,290 current US$ 112.12 million current US$ 112.11 million current US$ Ecuador
1990s 12,961 current US$ 184.76 million current US$ 184.74 million current US$ Ecuador
2000s 18,165 current US$ 106.91 million current US$ 106.89 million current US$ Ecuador
2010s 68,833 current US$ 30.35 million current US$ 30.28 million current US$ Ecuador
2020s 71,930 current US$ 0 current US$ 71,930 current US$ Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Aruba or Ecuador?
Aruba, at 64,588 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Ecuador as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Aruba and Ecuador?
64,588 current US$, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Ecuador?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Aruba and Ecuador rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Aruba ranks 110th and Ecuador ranks 113th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Ecuador: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/aruba/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/aruba/ecuador/">Aruba vs Ecuador: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.