Armenia vs Libya: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Armenia
- Libya
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 37.11 million current US$ against 32.77 million current US$ in Libya, a difference of 4.34 million current US$.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Libya ahead.
Armenia ranks 62nd and Libya ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 532,720 current US$ | 14.58 million current US$ | 14.04 million current US$ | Libya |
| 2000s | 5.96 million current US$ | 16.54 million current US$ | 10.57 million current US$ | Libya |
| 2010s | 31.30 million current US$ | 42.07 million current US$ | 10.77 million current US$ | Libya |
| 2020s | 35.64 million current US$ | 33.68 million current US$ | 1.96 million current US$ | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Armenia or Libya?
- Armenia, at 37.11 million current US$ against 32.77 million current US$ in Libya as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Armenia and Libya?
- 4.34 million current US$, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Libya?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and Libya rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Armenia ranks 62nd and Libya ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.