Armenia vs Belgium: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Armenia
- Belgium
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 44.61 million current US$ against 37.11 million current US$ in Armenia, a difference of 7.50 million current US$.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 62nd and Belgium ranks 61st of 186 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 532,720 current US$ | 58.98 million current US$ | 58.45 million current US$ | Belgium |
| 2000s | 5.96 million current US$ | 69.80 million current US$ | 63.84 million current US$ | Belgium |
| 2010s | 31.30 million current US$ | 66.08 million current US$ | 34.78 million current US$ | Belgium |
| 2020s | 35.64 million current US$ | 42.34 million current US$ | 6.70 million current US$ | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Armenia or Belgium?
- Belgium, at 44.61 million current US$ against 37.11 million current US$ in Armenia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Armenia and Belgium?
- 7.50 million current US$, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Belgium?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and Belgium rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Armenia ranks 62nd and Belgium ranks 61st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.