Angola vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Angola
458.79 million current US$
in 2021
Zimbabwe
516.33 million current US$
in 2021
Angola rank
22nd
Zimbabwe rank
19th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Angola
  • Zimbabwe
0200.0M400.0M600.0M197019952021

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 516.33 million current US$ against 458.79 million current US$ in Angola, a difference of 57.54 million current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 19th of 186 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 50.04 million current US$ 47.19 million current US$ 2.84 million current US$ Angola
1980s 71.70 million current US$ 109.07 million current US$ 37.37 million current US$ Zimbabwe
1990s 133.28 million current US$ 194.52 million current US$ 61.24 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 212.26 million current US$ 278.69 million current US$ 66.43 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 432.02 million current US$ 533.27 million current US$ 101.25 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 443.59 million current US$ 501.70 million current US$ 58.11 million current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Angola or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 516.33 million current US$ against 458.79 million current US$ in Angola as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Angola and Zimbabwe?
57.54 million current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Zimbabwe?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Angola and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Angola ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 19th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/angola/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/angola/zimbabwe/">Angola vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.