Albania vs Armenia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Albania
- Armenia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 37.11 million current US$ against 25.28 million current US$ in Albania, a difference of 11.83 million current US$.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.5 times Albania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 64th and Armenia ranks 62nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 1 and Armenia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Armenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.81 million current US$ | 532,720 current US$ | 3.28 million current US$ | Albania |
| 2000s | 5.18 million current US$ | 5.96 million current US$ | 779,735 current US$ | Armenia |
| 2010s | 20.77 million current US$ | 31.30 million current US$ | 10.52 million current US$ | Armenia |
| 2020s | 22.80 million current US$ | 35.64 million current US$ | 12.84 million current US$ | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Albania or Armenia?
- Armenia, at 37.11 million current US$ against 25.28 million current US$ in Albania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Albania and Armenia?
- 11.83 million current US$, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Armenia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Albania and Armenia rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Albania ranks 64th and Armenia ranks 62nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.