Ecuador vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$), annual growth

Ecuador
-100 % change on previous year
in 2011
Zambia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2011
Ecuador rank
112th
Zambia rank
112th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$), annual growth over time

  • Ecuador
  • Zambia
-1000100200197119912011

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Zambia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 25 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 112th and Zambia ranks 112th of 123 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 27.37 % change on previous year 21.25 % change on previous year 6.12 % change on previous year Ecuador
1980s 3.94 % change on previous year 5.28 % change on previous year 1.34 % change on previous year Zambia
1990s 7.92 % change on previous year 4.85 % change on previous year 3.08 % change on previous year Ecuador
2000s 10.41 % change on previous year 13.35 % change on previous year 2.95 % change on previous year Zambia
2010s -12.45 % change on previous year -70.94 % change on previous year 58.48 % change on previous year Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current us$), annual growth, Ecuador or Zambia?
Ecuador, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Zambia as of 2011.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current us$), annual growth between Ecuador and Zambia?
0 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zambia?
41 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2011.
How do Ecuador and Zambia rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current us$), annual growth?
Ecuador ranks 112th and Zambia ranks 112th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/zambia/">Ecuador vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 5,370 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.