Belgium vs Eritrea: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$), annual growth

Belgium
11.32 % change on previous year
in 2021
Eritrea
9.07 % change on previous year
in 2021
Belgium rank
10th
Eritrea rank
13th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$), annual growth over time

  • Belgium
  • Eritrea
-100-50050197119962021

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 11.32 % change on previous year against 9.07 % change on previous year in Eritrea, a difference of 2.25 % change on previous year.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.2 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Eritrea ahead.

Belgium ranks 10th and Eritrea ranks 13th of 123 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Eritrea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Eritrea Difference Ahead
1990s 1.18 % change on previous year 9.29 % change on previous year 8.12 % change on previous year Eritrea
2000s 4.58 % change on previous year -10.24 % change on previous year 14.82 % change on previous year Belgium
2020s 11.32 % change on previous year 9.07 % change on previous year 2.25 % change on previous year Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current us$), annual growth, Belgium or Eritrea?
Belgium, at 11.32 % change on previous year against 9.07 % change on previous year in Eritrea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current us$), annual growth between Belgium and Eritrea?
2.25 % change on previous year, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Eritrea?
17 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2021.
How do Belgium and Eritrea rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current us$), annual growth?
Belgium ranks 10th and Eritrea ranks 13th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Eritrea: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/belgium/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/belgium/eritrea/">Belgium vs Eritrea: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 5,370 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.