Australia vs Peru: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$), annual growth

Australia
-1.58 % change on previous year
in 2021
Peru
-2.17 % change on previous year
in 2021
Australia rank
64th
Peru rank
66th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$), annual growth over time

  • Australia
  • Peru
-100-50050100197119962021

How they compare

Australia currently reports -1.58 % change on previous year against -2.17 % change on previous year in Peru, a difference of 0.59 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 64th and Peru ranks 66th of 123 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Peru Difference Ahead
1970s 24.57 % change on previous year 24.87 % change on previous year 0.3014 % change on previous year Peru
1980s 3.35 % change on previous year -3.5 % change on previous year 6.86 % change on previous year Australia
1990s 1.32 % change on previous year 10.79 % change on previous year 9.47 % change on previous year Peru
2000s -41.1 % change on previous year -6.83 % change on previous year 34.27 % change on previous year Peru
2020s -1.58 % change on previous year -2.17 % change on previous year 0.5963 % change on previous year Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current us$), annual growth, Australia or Peru?
Australia, at -1.58 % change on previous year against -2.17 % change on previous year in Peru as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current us$), annual growth between Australia and Peru?
0.59 % change on previous year, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Peru?
32 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Australia and Peru rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current us$), annual growth?
Australia ranks 64th and Peru ranks 66th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Peru: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/australia/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us-annual-growth-rate/australia/peru/">Australia vs Peru: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 5,370 data points, 1971–2021
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.