Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion

Myanmar
5.4%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
5.1%
in 2021
Myanmar rank
54th
Zimbabwe rank
57th

Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion over time

  • Myanmar
  • Zimbabwe
020406080197019952021

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 5.4% against 5.1% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.3%.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Myanmar ahead.

Myanmar ranks 54th and Zimbabwe ranks 57th of 184 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 25.6% 2.7% 23.0% Myanmar
1980s 33.6% 3.0% 30.5% Myanmar
1990s 18.5% 5.3% 13.2% Myanmar
2000s 14.3% 12.2% 2.0% Myanmar
2010s 6.0% 5.0% 1.0% Myanmar
2020s 4.4% 4.6% 0.2% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: natural resources depletion, Myanmar or Zimbabwe?
Myanmar, at 5.4% against 5.1% in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: natural resources depletion between Myanmar and Zimbabwe?
0.3%, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Zimbabwe?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
How do Myanmar and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: natural resources depletion?
Myanmar ranks 54th and Zimbabwe ranks 57th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-natural-resources-depletion-percent-of-gni/myanmar/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-natural-resources-depletion-percent-of-gni/myanmar/zimbabwe/">Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
231 places, 9,601 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Natural resource depletion is the sum of net forest depletion, energy depletion, and mineral depletion. Net forest depletion is unit resource rents times the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. Energy depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of energy resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers coal, crude oil, and natural gas. Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.