Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion
Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion over time
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 20.6% against 5.3% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 15.3%.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 3.9 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)'s.
Across all 40 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 11th and Papua New Guinea ranks 10th of 47 groups.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 7.5% | 15.6% | 8.2% | Papua New Guinea |
| 1990s | 5.4% | 17.3% | 11.9% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 7.6% | 20.0% | 12.4% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 5.5% | 11.7% | 6.2% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 4.2% | 15.2% | 11.0% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: natural resources depletion, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 20.6% against 5.3% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: natural resources depletion between Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Papua New Guinea?
- 15.3%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Papua New Guinea?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2021.
- How do Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Papua New Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: natural resources depletion?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 11th and Papua New Guinea ranks 10th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural resource depletion is the sum of net forest depletion, energy depletion, and mineral depletion. Net forest depletion is unit resource rents times the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. Energy depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of energy resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers coal, crude oil, and natural gas. Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.