Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion

Malawi
4.3%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
5.1%
in 2021
Malawi rank
60th
Zimbabwe rank
57th

Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion over time

  • Malawi
  • Zimbabwe
010203040197119962021

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 5.1% against 4.3% in Malawi, a difference of 0.8%.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 60th and Zimbabwe ranks 57th of 184 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 7.1% 3.0% 4.1% Malawi
1990s 10.8% 5.3% 5.6% Malawi
2000s 7.9% 12.2% 4.3% Zimbabwe
2010s 7.8% 5.0% 2.9% Malawi
2020s 4.2% 4.6% 0.4% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: natural resources depletion, Malawi or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 5.1% against 4.3% in Malawi as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: natural resources depletion between Malawi and Zimbabwe?
0.8%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?
42 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2021.
How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: natural resources depletion?
Malawi ranks 60th and Zimbabwe ranks 57th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-natural-resources-depletion-percent-of-gni/malawi/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-natural-resources-depletion-percent-of-gni/malawi/zimbabwe/">Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
231 places, 9,601 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Natural resource depletion is the sum of net forest depletion, energy depletion, and mineral depletion. Net forest depletion is unit resource rents times the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. Energy depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of energy resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers coal, crude oil, and natural gas. Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.