Georgia vs Pakistan: Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion

Georgia
1.1%
in 2021
Pakistan
1.1%
in 2021
Georgia rank
95th
Pakistan rank
96th

Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion over time

  • Georgia
  • Pakistan
02468197019952021

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 1.1% against 1.1% in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Pakistan ahead.

Georgia ranks 95th and Pakistan ranks 96th of 184 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Pakistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2% 1.0% 0.8% Pakistan
2000s 0.4% 1.7% 1.2% Pakistan
2010s 0.6% 1.3% 0.7% Pakistan
2020s 0.9% 1.0% 0.1% Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: natural resources depletion, Georgia or Pakistan?
Georgia, at 1.1% against 1.1% in Pakistan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: natural resources depletion between Georgia and Pakistan?
0.0%, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Pakistan?
24 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2021.
How do Georgia and Pakistan rank globally for adjusted savings: natural resources depletion?
Georgia ranks 95th and Pakistan ranks 96th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Pakistan: Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-natural-resources-depletion-percent-of-gni/georgia/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-natural-resources-depletion-percent-of-gni/georgia/pakistan/">Georgia vs Pakistan: Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
231 places, 9,601 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Natural resource depletion is the sum of net forest depletion, energy depletion, and mineral depletion. Net forest depletion is unit resource rents times the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. Energy depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of energy resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers coal, crude oil, and natural gas. Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.