Botswana vs Cape Verde: Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion

Botswana
0.9%
in 2021
Cape Verde
0.8%
in 2021
Botswana rank
100th
Cape Verde rank
101st

Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion over time

  • Botswana
  • Cape Verde
0246197119962021

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.9% against 0.8% in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.1%.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Botswana ranks 100th and Cape Verde ranks 101st of 184 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Cape Verde in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Cape Verde Difference Ahead
1980s 3.5% 2.2% 1.4% Botswana
1990s 1.3% 1.3% 0.1% Cape Verde
2000s 2.5% 1.1% 1.4% Botswana
2010s 1.0% 0.9% 0.0% Botswana
2020s 0.7% 0.7% 0.0% Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: natural resources depletion, Botswana or Cape Verde?
Botswana, at 0.9% against 0.8% in Cape Verde as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: natural resources depletion between Botswana and Cape Verde?
0.1%, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Cape Verde?
35 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2021.
How do Botswana and Cape Verde rank globally for adjusted savings: natural resources depletion?
Botswana ranks 100th and Cape Verde ranks 101st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Cape Verde: Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-natural-resources-depletion-percent-of-gni/botswana/cabo-verde/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-natural-resources-depletion-percent-of-gni/botswana/cabo-verde/">Botswana vs Cape Verde: Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
231 places, 9,601 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Natural resource depletion is the sum of net forest depletion, energy depletion, and mineral depletion. Net forest depletion is unit resource rents times the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. Energy depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of energy resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers coal, crude oil, and natural gas. Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.