South Africa vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion

South Africa
2.7%
in 2021
Tanzania
3.1%
in 2021
South Africa rank
26th
Tanzania rank
24th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion over time

  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
0246197019952021

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 3.1% against 2.7% in South Africa, a difference of 0.4%.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.2 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1988 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 26th and Tanzania ranks 24th of 208 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Tanzania Difference Ahead
1980s 1.6% 0.0% 1.6% South Africa
1990s 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% South Africa
2000s 0.7% 0.6% 0.1% South Africa
2010s 0.8% 1.3% 0.4% Tanzania
2020s 1.8% 2.0% 0.2% Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion, South Africa or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 3.1% against 2.7% in South Africa as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion between South Africa and Tanzania?
0.4%, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Tanzania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2021.
How do South Africa and Tanzania rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion?
South Africa ranks 26th and Tanzania ranks 24th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-percent-of-gni/south-africa/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-percent-of-gni/south-africa/tanzania/">South Africa vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
256 places, 11,019 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.