Romania vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion over time
- Romania
- South Sudan
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.4 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 81st and South Sudan ranks 83rd of 208 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion, Romania or South Sudan?
- Romania, at 0.0% against 0.0% in South Sudan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion between Romania and South Sudan?
- 0.0%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do Romania and South Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion?
- Romania ranks 81st and South Sudan ranks 83rd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.