South Sudan vs Uruguay: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion

South Sudan
7.23 million current US$
in 2021
Uruguay
5.61 million current US$
in 2021
South Sudan rank
83rd
Uruguay rank
86th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion over time

  • South Sudan
  • Uruguay
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M197019952021

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 7.23 million current US$ against 5.61 million current US$ in Uruguay, a difference of 1.63 million current US$.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.3 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Uruguay ahead.

South Sudan ranks 83rd and Uruguay ranks 86th of 218 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Uruguay Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ 0 current US$ 0 current US$
1980s 0 current US$ 0 current US$ 0 current US$
1990s 0 current US$ 1.00 million current US$ 1.00 million current US$ Uruguay
2000s 0 current US$ 12.87 million current US$ 12.87 million current US$ Uruguay
2010s 1.06 million current US$ 18.34 million current US$ 17.28 million current US$ Uruguay
2020s 4.51 million current US$ 2.80 million current US$ 1.71 million current US$ South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion, South Sudan or Uruguay?
South Sudan, at 7.23 million current US$ against 5.61 million current US$ in Uruguay as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion between South Sudan and Uruguay?
1.63 million current US$, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Uruguay?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do South Sudan and Uruguay rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion?
South Sudan ranks 83rd and Uruguay ranks 86th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Uruguay: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/south-sudan/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/south-sudan/uruguay/">South Sudan vs Uruguay: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 11,385 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.