Rwanda vs Solomon Islands: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion

Rwanda
0 current US$
in 2021
Solomon Islands
0 current US$
in 2021
Rwanda rank
94th
Solomon Islands rank
94th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion over time

  • Rwanda
  • Solomon Islands
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M197019952021

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 current US$.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 94th and Solomon Islands ranks 94th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 3 and Solomon Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 1.55 million current US$ 1,951 current US$ 1.55 million current US$ Rwanda
1980s 1.73 million current US$ 125,469 current US$ 1.61 million current US$ Rwanda
1990s 95,612 current US$ 703,664 current US$ 608,052 current US$ Solomon Islands
2000s 1.01 million current US$ 277,360 current US$ 732,370 current US$ Rwanda
2010s 4.04 million current US$ 11.07 million current US$ 7.04 million current US$ Solomon Islands
2020s 0 current US$ 0 current US$ 0 current US$

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion, Rwanda or Solomon Islands?
Rwanda, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Solomon Islands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion between Rwanda and Solomon Islands?
0 current US$, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Solomon Islands?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Rwanda and Solomon Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion?
Rwanda ranks 94th and Solomon Islands ranks 94th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Solomon Islands: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/rwanda/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/rwanda/solomon-islands/">Rwanda vs Solomon Islands: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 11,281 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.