Panama vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion

Panama
789.54 million current US$
in 2021
Zimbabwe
850.71 million current US$
in 2021
Panama rank
37th
Zimbabwe rank
36th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion over time

  • Panama
  • Zimbabwe
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M197019952021

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 850.71 million current US$ against 789.54 million current US$ in Panama, a difference of 61.17 million current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Panama ranks 37th and Zimbabwe ranks 36th of 216 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ 33.63 million current US$ 33.63 million current US$ Zimbabwe
1980s 0 current US$ 51.19 million current US$ 51.19 million current US$ Zimbabwe
1990s 302,175 current US$ 63.48 million current US$ 63.18 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 2.43 million current US$ 94.93 million current US$ 92.50 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 24.77 million current US$ 258.73 million current US$ 233.97 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 433.48 million current US$ 605.61 million current US$ 172.13 million current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion, Panama or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 850.71 million current US$ against 789.54 million current US$ in Panama as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion between Panama and Zimbabwe?
61.17 million current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zimbabwe?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Panama and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion?
Panama ranks 37th and Zimbabwe ranks 36th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/panama/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/panama/zimbabwe/">Panama vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 11,281 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.