Namibia vs New Zealand: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion

Namibia
262.77 million current US$
in 2021
New Zealand
186.27 million current US$
in 2021
Namibia rank
56th
New Zealand rank
58th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion over time

  • Namibia
  • New Zealand
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M197019952021

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 262.77 million current US$ against 186.27 million current US$ in New Zealand, a difference of 76.50 million current US$.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.4 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 56th and New Zealand ranks 58th of 218 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 5 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 30.94 million current US$ 2.18 million current US$ 28.76 million current US$ Namibia
1980s 102.45 million current US$ 6.76 million current US$ 95.70 million current US$ Namibia
1990s 18.03 million current US$ 14.65 million current US$ 3.38 million current US$ Namibia
2000s 66.45 million current US$ 42.89 million current US$ 23.56 million current US$ Namibia
2010s 102.35 million current US$ 121.14 million current US$ 18.80 million current US$ New Zealand
2020s 167.25 million current US$ 123.57 million current US$ 43.68 million current US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion, Namibia or New Zealand?
Namibia, at 262.77 million current US$ against 186.27 million current US$ in New Zealand as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion between Namibia and New Zealand?
76.50 million current US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and New Zealand?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Namibia and New Zealand rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion?
Namibia ranks 56th and New Zealand ranks 58th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs New Zealand: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/namibia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/namibia/new-zealand/">Namibia vs New Zealand: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 11,385 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.