Mali vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion

Mali
2.40 billion current US$
in 2021
Papua New Guinea
2.33 billion current US$
in 2021
Mali rank
22nd
Papua New Guinea rank
24th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion over time

  • Mali
  • Papua New Guinea
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B197019952021

How they compare

Mali currently reports 2.40 billion current US$ against 2.33 billion current US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 67.16 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Mali ranks 22nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 24th of 218 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 2,509 current US$ 131.29 million current US$ 131.29 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
1980s 640,958 current US$ 307.66 million current US$ 307.01 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
1990s 12.80 million current US$ 239.52 million current US$ 226.72 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 148.29 million current US$ 462.21 million current US$ 313.91 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 573.80 million current US$ 611.38 million current US$ 37.57 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 1.66 billion current US$ 1.41 billion current US$ 254.28 million current US$ Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion, Mali or Papua New Guinea?
Mali, at 2.40 billion current US$ against 2.33 billion current US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion between Mali and Papua New Guinea?
67.16 million current US$, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Papua New Guinea?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Mali and Papua New Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion?
Mali ranks 22nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 24th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/mali/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/mali/papua-new-guinea/">Mali vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 11,385 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.