Luxembourg vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion over time
- Luxembourg
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 218 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 197,666 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 197,666 current US$ | Luxembourg |
| 1980s | 0 current US$ | 8,484 current US$ | 8,484 current US$ | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 5.06 million current US$ | 446,404 current US$ | 4.61 million current US$ | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 6.89 million current US$ | 930,309 current US$ | 5.96 million current US$ | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion, Luxembourg or Sri Lanka?
- Luxembourg, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Sri Lanka as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion between Luxembourg and Sri Lanka?
- 0 current US$, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Sri Lanka?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Luxembourg and Sri Lanka rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion?
- Luxembourg ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.