Japan vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion

Japan
275.91 million current US$
in 2021
Namibia
262.77 million current US$
in 2021
Japan rank
55th
Namibia rank
56th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion over time

  • Japan
  • Namibia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B197019952021

How they compare

Japan currently reports 275.91 million current US$ against 262.77 million current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 13.14 million current US$.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 55th and Namibia ranks 56th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Namibia Difference Ahead
1970s 67.67 million current US$ 30.94 million current US$ 36.73 million current US$ Japan
1980s 40.94 million current US$ 102.45 million current US$ 61.51 million current US$ Namibia
1990s 28.86 million current US$ 18.03 million current US$ 10.83 million current US$ Japan
2000s 39.21 million current US$ 66.45 million current US$ 27.25 million current US$ Namibia
2010s 227.25 million current US$ 102.35 million current US$ 124.91 million current US$ Japan
2020s 757.54 million current US$ 167.25 million current US$ 590.28 million current US$ Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion, Japan or Namibia?
Japan, at 275.91 million current US$ against 262.77 million current US$ in Namibia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion between Japan and Namibia?
13.14 million current US$, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Namibia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Japan and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion?
Japan ranks 55th and Namibia ranks 56th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/japan/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/japan/namibia/">Japan vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 11,281 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.