Ethiopia vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion

Ethiopia
228.18 million current US$
in 2021
Georgia
184.49 million current US$
in 2021
Ethiopia rank
57th
Georgia rank
59th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Georgia
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M250.0M197019952021

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 228.18 million current US$ against 184.49 million current US$ in Georgia, a difference of 43.68 million current US$.

That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Georgia ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 57th and Georgia ranks 59th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 5 and Georgia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Georgia Difference Ahead
1970s 21,832 current US$ 0 current US$ 21,832 current US$ Ethiopia
1980s 714,165 current US$ 0 current US$ 714,165 current US$ Ethiopia
1990s 3.73 million current US$ 1.78 million current US$ 1.94 million current US$ Ethiopia
2000s 12.39 million current US$ 17.43 million current US$ 5.04 million current US$ Georgia
2010s 87.88 million current US$ 74.42 million current US$ 13.46 million current US$ Ethiopia
2020s 147.71 million current US$ 140.29 million current US$ 7.41 million current US$ Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion, Ethiopia or Georgia?
Ethiopia, at 228.18 million current US$ against 184.49 million current US$ in Georgia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion between Ethiopia and Georgia?
43.68 million current US$, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Georgia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Ethiopia and Georgia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion?
Ethiopia ranks 57th and Georgia ranks 59th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/ethiopia/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/ethiopia/georgia/">Ethiopia vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 11,281 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.