Eritrea vs Laos: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion

Eritrea
406.57 million current US$
in 2021
Laos
328.08 million current US$
in 2021
Eritrea rank
48th
Laos rank
51st

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion over time

  • Eritrea
  • Laos
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M500.0M197019952021

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 406.57 million current US$ against 328.08 million current US$ in Laos, a difference of 78.48 million current US$.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.2 times Laos's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Laos ahead.

Eritrea ranks 48th and Laos ranks 51st of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Laos in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Laos Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ 587,780 current US$ 587,780 current US$ Laos
1980s 0 current US$ 719,762 current US$ 719,762 current US$ Laos
1990s 293,456 current US$ 0 current US$ 293,456 current US$ Eritrea
2000s 123,478 current US$ 92.99 million current US$ 92.86 million current US$ Laos
2010s 122.83 million current US$ 301.16 million current US$ 178.33 million current US$ Laos
2020s 221.27 million current US$ 217.30 million current US$ 3.97 million current US$ Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion, Eritrea or Laos?
Eritrea, at 406.57 million current US$ against 328.08 million current US$ in Laos as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion between Eritrea and Laos?
78.48 million current US$, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Laos?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Eritrea and Laos rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion?
Eritrea ranks 48th and Laos ranks 51st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Laos: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/eritrea/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/eritrea/lao-pdr/">Eritrea vs Laos: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 11,281 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.