Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion

Congo
0 current US$
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea
0 current US$
in 2021
Congo rank
94th
Equatorial Guinea rank
94th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion over time

  • Congo
  • Equatorial Guinea
02.0M4.0M6.0M197019952021

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 current US$.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 94th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 94th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 1.23 million current US$ 0 current US$ 1.23 million current US$ Congo
1980s 1.22 million current US$ 0 current US$ 1.22 million current US$ Congo
1990s 2.03 million current US$ 115,768 current US$ 1.92 million current US$ Congo
2000s 242,639 current US$ 769,855 current US$ 527,216 current US$ Equatorial Guinea
2010s 1.17 million current US$ 1.15 million current US$ 17,905 current US$ Congo
2020s 0 current US$ 0 current US$ 0 current US$

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion, Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
Congo, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Equatorial Guinea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
0 current US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion?
Congo ranks 94th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 94th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/">Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 11,281 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.