Colombia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion

Colombia
2.07 billion current US$
in 2021
Tanzania, United Republic of
2.12 billion current US$
in 2021
Colombia rank
28th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
27th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion over time

  • Colombia
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B197019952021

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 2.12 billion current US$ against 2.07 billion current US$ in Colombia, a difference of 42.93 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 28th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 27th of 218 countries.

Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1970s 646,876 current US$ 14,824 current US$ 632,052 current US$ Colombia
1980s 53.97 million current US$ 85,332 current US$ 53.88 million current US$ Colombia
1990s 92.18 million current US$ 2.34 million current US$ 89.84 million current US$ Colombia
2000s 790.26 million current US$ 104.81 million current US$ 685.45 million current US$ Colombia
2010s 966.55 million current US$ 546.34 million current US$ 420.21 million current US$ Colombia
2020s 1.37 billion current US$ 1.34 billion current US$ 27.95 million current US$ Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion, Colombia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 2.12 billion current US$ against 2.07 billion current US$ in Colombia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion between Colombia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
42.93 million current US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Colombia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion?
Colombia ranks 28th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 27th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/colombia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/colombia/tanzania/">Colombia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 11,385 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.