Brazil vs China: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion

Brazil
23.22 billion current US$
in 2021
China
56.61 billion current US$
in 2021
Brazil rank
5th
China rank
2nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion over time

  • Brazil
  • China
050.0B100.0B150.0B197019952021

How they compare

China currently reports 56.61 billion current US$ against 23.22 billion current US$ in Brazil, a difference of 33.39 billion current US$.

That makes China's figure about 2.4 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was China ahead.

Brazil ranks 5th and China ranks 2nd of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and China in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil China Difference Ahead
1970s 254.93 million current US$ 196.53 million current US$ 58.39 million current US$ Brazil
1980s 712.42 million current US$ 710.32 million current US$ 2.10 million current US$ Brazil
1990s 819.90 million current US$ 1.16 billion current US$ 338.40 million current US$ China
2000s 3.92 billion current US$ 18.47 billion current US$ 14.55 billion current US$ China
2010s 8.73 billion current US$ 40.86 billion current US$ 32.13 billion current US$ China
2020s 14.20 billion current US$ 36.55 billion current US$ 22.36 billion current US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion, Brazil or China?
China, at 56.61 billion current US$ against 23.22 billion current US$ in Brazil as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion between Brazil and China?
33.39 billion current US$, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and China?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Brazil and China rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion?
Brazil ranks 5th and China ranks 2nd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs China: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/brazil/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/brazil/china/">Brazil vs China: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 11,281 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.