Australia vs Chile: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion

Australia
68.60 billion current US$
in 2021
Chile
28.09 billion current US$
in 2021
Australia rank
1st
Chile rank
4th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion over time

  • Australia
  • Chile
020.0B40.0B60.0B197019952021

How they compare

Australia currently reports 68.60 billion current US$ against 28.09 billion current US$ in Chile, a difference of 40.51 billion current US$.

That makes Australia's figure about 2.4 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Chile ahead.

Australia ranks 1st and Chile ranks 4th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Chile Difference Ahead
1970s 442.31 million current US$ 586.57 million current US$ 144.26 million current US$ Chile
1980s 933.59 million current US$ 993.49 million current US$ 59.90 million current US$ Chile
1990s 1.34 billion current US$ 1.44 billion current US$ 97.35 million current US$ Chile
2000s 6.72 billion current US$ 7.45 billion current US$ 722.44 million current US$ Chile
2010s 15.98 billion current US$ 8.44 billion current US$ 7.54 billion current US$ Australia
2020s 45.99 billion current US$ 17.20 billion current US$ 28.79 billion current US$ Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion, Australia or Chile?
Australia, at 68.60 billion current US$ against 28.09 billion current US$ in Chile as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion between Australia and Chile?
40.51 billion current US$, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chile?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Australia and Chile rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion?
Australia ranks 1st and Chile ranks 4th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Chile: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/australia/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us/australia/chile/">Australia vs Chile: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 11,281 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25 years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.