North Macedonia vs Suriname: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP

North Macedonia
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
Suriname
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
North Macedonia rank
94th
Suriname rank
94th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Suriname
00.050.10.15197019952021

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Suriname, a difference of 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Suriname ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 94th and Suriname ranks 94th of 214 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0144 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0132 current US$ per US$ of GDP Suriname
2000s 0.0045 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0153 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0107 current US$ per US$ of GDP Suriname
2010s 0.0049 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0753 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0705 current US$ per US$ of GDP Suriname
2020s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp, North Macedonia or Suriname?
North Macedonia, at 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Suriname as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp between North Macedonia and Suriname?
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Suriname?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do North Macedonia and Suriname rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp?
North Macedonia ranks 94th and Suriname ranks 94th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Suriname: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/north-macedonia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/north-macedonia/suriname/">North Macedonia vs Suriname: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,809 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.