New Caledonia vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP

New Caledonia
0.0887 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
Papua New Guinea
0.0894 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
New Caledonia rank
9th
Papua New Guinea rank
7th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Papua New Guinea
00.050.10.15197019952021

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.0894 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0887 current US$ per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 9th and Papua New Guinea ranks 7th of 214 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0547 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0851 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0304 current US$ per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
1980s 0.0227 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1083 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0856 current US$ per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
1990s 0.0365 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0565 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
2000s 0.0474 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0659 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0185 current US$ per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
2010s 0.0026 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0326 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0301 current US$ per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
2020s 0.0444 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0548 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0104 current US$ per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp, New Caledonia or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 0.0894 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0887 current US$ per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp between New Caledonia and Papua New Guinea?
0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Papua New Guinea?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do New Caledonia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp?
New Caledonia ranks 9th and Papua New Guinea ranks 7th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/papua-new-guinea/">New Caledonia vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,809 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.