Equatorial Guinea vs Slovenia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP

Equatorial Guinea
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
Slovenia
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea rank
94th
Slovenia rank
94th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Slovenia
00.0010.0010.0020.002197019952021

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Slovenia, a difference of 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Slovenia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 94th and Slovenia ranks 94th of 214 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp, Equatorial Guinea or Slovenia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Slovenia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp between Equatorial Guinea and Slovenia?
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Slovenia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Slovenia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 94th and Slovenia ranks 94th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Slovenia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/equatorial-guinea/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/equatorial-guinea/slovenia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Slovenia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,809 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.