Congo vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP

Congo
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
Hong Kong
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
Congo rank
94th
Hong Kong rank
94th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Congo
  • Hong Kong
00.0010.0020.0030.004197019952021

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Hong Kong, a difference of 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 94th and Hong Kong ranks 94th of 214 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0018 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0018 current US$ per US$ of GDP Congo
1980s 0.0006 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0006 current US$ per US$ of GDP Congo
1990s 0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP Congo
2000s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP Congo
2010s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP Congo
2020s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp, Congo or Hong Kong?
Congo, at 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Hong Kong as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp between Congo and Hong Kong?
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Hong Kong?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Congo and Hong Kong rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Congo ranks 94th and Hong Kong ranks 94th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/hong-kong-sar-china/">Congo vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,809 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.