Democratic Republic of Congo vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP

Democratic Republic of Congo
0.1994 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
Zambia
0.1924 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
1st
Zambia rank
2nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Zambia
00.050.10.150.2197019952021

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 0.1994 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1924 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Zambia, a difference of 0.007 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 2nd of 214 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0073 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1076 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1003 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
1980s 0.0071 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0379 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0309 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
1990s 0.0015 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0088 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0073 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
2000s 0.0054 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0318 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0263 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
2010s 0.0345 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0397 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0052 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
2020s 0.1233 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1233 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp, Democratic Republic of Congo or Zambia?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 0.1994 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1924 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Zambia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp between Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia?
0.007 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 2nd of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/zambia/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,809 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.