Chile vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP

Chile
0.089 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
New Caledonia
0.0887 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
Chile rank
8th
New Caledonia rank
9th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Chile
  • New Caledonia
00.050.10.15197019952021

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.089 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0887 current US$ per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Chile ranks 8th and New Caledonia ranks 9th of 214 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0437 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0547 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.011 current US$ per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1980s 0.0409 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0227 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0182 current US$ per US$ of GDP Chile
1990s 0.0245 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0365 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.012 current US$ per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
2000s 0.0531 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0474 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0056 current US$ per US$ of GDP Chile
2010s 0.0328 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0026 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0303 current US$ per US$ of GDP Chile
2020s 0.057 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0444 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0126 current US$ per US$ of GDP Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp, Chile or New Caledonia?
Chile, at 0.089 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0887 current US$ per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp between Chile and New Caledonia?
0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Caledonia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Chile and New Caledonia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Chile ranks 8th and New Caledonia ranks 9th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/new-caledonia/">Chile vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,809 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.